Slide 1
"How does
information get into..."
|
|
|
How does information get into
memory? |
|
Through your stomach? |
|
Ghrelin (associated with growth
hormone release and with appetite) can enter the hippocampus |
|
Ghrelin is released when the
stomach is empty |
|
It binds with hippocampal
neurons to foster alterations in connections during learning |
"What are some
potential real-world..."
|
|
|
What are some potential
real-world implications of these findings? |
|
Plausible speculation: Children
may not benefit from overeating at breakfast |
|
Ghrelin-like drugs may protect
against dementia, like Alzheimer’s disease |
Human Memory: Basic
Questions
|
|
|
How is information maintained
in memory? |
|
How is information pulled back
out of memory? |
|
How is forgetting related to
learning? |
|
|
Figure 7.2 Three key
processes in memory. Memory depends on three sequential processes: encoding,
storage, and retrieval. Some theorists have drawn an analogy between these
processes and elements of information processing by computers as depicted here.
The analogies for encoding and retrieval work pretty well, but the storage
analogy is somewhat misleading. When information is stored on a hard drive, it
remains unchanged indefinitely and you can retrieve an exact copy. As you will
learn in this chapter, memory storage is a much more dynamic process. Our
memories change over time and are rough reconstructions rather than exact
copies of past events.
Encoding: Getting
Information Into Memory
|
|
|
|
|
The role of attention |
|
Focusing awareness |
|
Selective attention |
|
Divided attention |
Levels of Processing
|
|
|
|
Craik and Lockhart: incoming
information is processed at different levels |
|
Levels of processing: |
|
Structural = shallow |
|
Phonemic = intermediate |
|
Semantic = deep |
|
Deeper processing = longer
lasting memory codes |
Figure 7.3
Levels-of-processing theory. According to Craik and Lockhart (1972),
structural, phonemic, and semantic encoding—which can be elicited by questions
such as those shown on the right—involve progressively deeper levels of
processing, which should result in more durable memories.
Enriching Encoding
|
|
|
|
Elaboration = linking a
stimulus to other information at the time of encoding |
|
Thinking of examples |
|
Visual Imagery = creation of
visual images to represent words to be remembered |
|
Easier for concrete objects:
Dual-coding theory |
Storage: Maintaining
Information in Memory
|
|
|
|
|
Analogy: information storage in
computers ~ information storage in human memory |
|
Information-processing theories |
|
Subdivide memory into 3
different stores |
|
Sensory, Short-term, Long-term |
|
|
Figure 7.6 The Atkinson
and Shiffrin model of memory storage. Atkinson and Shiffrin (1971) proposed
that memory is made up of three information stores. Sensory memory can hold a
large amount of information just long enough (a fraction of a second) for a
small portion of it to be selected for longer storage. Short-term memory has a
limited capacity, and unless aided by rehearsal, its storage duration is brief.
Long-term memory can store an apparently unlimited amount of information for
indeterminate periods.
Sensory Memory
|
|
|
Brief preservation of
information in original sensory form |
|
Afterimage |
|
Auditory/Visual – approximately
¼ second |
|
|
Short Term Memory (STM)
|
|
|
|
Limited duration – about 20
seconds without rehearsal |
|
Rehearsal – the process of
repetitively verbalizing or thinking about the information |
|
Limited capacity – magical
number 7 plus or minus 2 |
|
Chunking – grouping familiar
stimuli for storage as a single unit |
|
|
|
|
Short-Term Memory as
“Working Memory”
|
|
|
|
STM not limited to phonemic
encoding |
|
Loss of information not only
due to decay and displacement |
|
Baddeley (2001) – 4 components
of working memory |
|
Phonological rehearsal loop |
|
Visuospatial sketchpad |
|
Executive control system |
|
Episodic buffer |
Figure 7.7 Short-term
memory as working memory. This diagram depicts the revised model of the
short-term store proposed by Alan Baddeley. According to Baddeley (2001),
working memory includes four components: a phonological rehearsal loop, a
visuospatial sketchpad, an executive control system, and an episodic buffer.
Long-Term Memory
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited capacity store that
can hold information over lengthy periods of time |
|
Permanent storage? |
|
Flashbulb memories |
|
|
Is exposure enough for
remembering?
|
|
|
|
Draw the front of the following
U.S. coins: |
|
Penny |
|
Nickel |
|
Dime |
|
Quarter |
|
|
Slide 18
"You are going to go..."
|
|
|
You are going to go through a
test of your memory. |
|
Read each word that you will
see. |
|
When I give you the
instruction, recall as many of the words as you can. |
|
|
|
|
How Is Knowledge
Represented and Organized in Memory?
|
|
|
|
|
Schemas |
|
Semantic Networks |
|
Connectionist Networks and PDP
Models |
Figure 7.8 A semantic
network. Much of the organization of long-term memory depends on networks of
associations among concepts. In this highly simplified depiction of a fragment
of a semantic network, the shorter the line linking any two concepts, the
stronger the association between them. The coloration of the concept boxes
represents activation of the concepts. This is how the network might look just
after a person hears the words fire engine.
Source: Adapted from Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1975). A spreading
activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428.
Copyright © 1975 by the American Psychological Association. Adapted by
permission of the authors.
Retrieval: Getting
Information Out of Memory
|
|
|
|
|
The tip-of-the-tongue
phenomenon – a failure in retrieval |
|
Retrieval cues |
|
Recalling an event |
|
Context cues |
|
Reconstructing memories |
|
Misinformation effect |
|
Source monitoring |
Figure 7.9 The
misinformation effect. In an experiment by Loftus and Palmer (1974),
participants who were asked leading questions in which cars were described as hitting
or smashing each other were prone to recall the same accident differently one
week later, demonstrating the reconstructive nature of memory.
A Brief Assignment
|
|
|
You have an assignment between
now and the next time we meet |
|
The assignment requires no
extra reading or writing |
|
Your Assignment: |
|
Forget this: 911 |
|
You will be tested on your
forgetting when we meet after break. |
"Write down the
names of..."
|
|
|
Write down the names of all the
U.S. presidents you can recall. |
The U.S. Presidents
|
|
|
Washington |
|
Adams |
|
Jefferson |
|
Madison |
|
Monroe |
|
Adams |
|
Jackson |
|
Van Buren |
|
Harrison |
|
Tyler |
|
Polk |
|
Taylor |
|
Fillmore |
|
Pierce |
|
Buchanan |
|
Lincoln |
|
Johnson |
|
Grant |
|
Hayes |
|
Garfield |
|
Arthur |
|
Cleveland |
"Serial Position
Effect"
|
|
|
Serial Position Effect |
|
Primacy and Recency Effects |
|
Von Restorff Effect |
|
|
|
Proactive Interference |
|
Retroactive Interference |
Forgetting: When Memory
Lapses
|
|
|
|
Ebbinghaus’s Forgetting Curve |
|
Nonsense syllables |
|
Retention – the proportion of
material retained |
|
Measures of Forgetting |
|
Recall |
|
Recognition |
|
|
Figure 7.10 Ebbinghaus’s
forgetting curve for nonsense syllables. From his experiments on himself,
Ebbinghaus concluded that forgetting is extremely rapid immediately after the
original learning and then levels off. Although this generalization remains
true, subsequent research has shown that forgetting curves for nonsense
syllables are unusually steep. (Data from Ebbinghaus, 1885)
Why We Forget
|
|
|
|
Ineffective Encoding |
|
Decay theory |
|
Interference theory |
|
Proactive |
|
Retroactive |
|
Encoding specificity principle |
Figure 7.11 Effects of
interference. According to interference theory, more interference from
competing information should produce more forgetting. McGeoch and McDonald
(1931) controlled the amount of interference with a learning task by varying
the similarity of an intervening task. The results were consistent with
interference theory. The amount of interference is greatest at the left of the
graph, as is the amount of forgetting. As interference decreases (moving to the
right on the graph), retention improves. (Data from McGeoch & McDonald,
1931)
Figure 7.12 Retroactive
and proactive interference. Retroactive interference occurs when learning
produces a “backward” effect, reducing recall of previously learned material.
Proactive interference occurs when learning produces a “forward” effect,
reducing recall of subsequently learned material. For example, if you were to
prepare for an economics test and then study psychology, the interference from
the psychology study would be retroactive interference. However, if you studied
psychology first and then economics, the interference from the psychology study
would be proactive interference
The Repressed Memories
Controversy
|
|
|
|
Repression |
|
Authenticity of repressed
memories? |
|
Memory illusions |
|
Controversy |
Figure 7.15 Retrograde
versus anterograde amnesia. In retrograde amnesia, memory for events that
occurred prior to the onset of amnesia is lost. In anterograde amnesia, memory
for events that occur subsequent to the onset of amnesia suffers.
In Search of the Memory
Trace: The Physiology of Memory
|
|
|
|
|
Anatomy of Memory |
|
Anterograde and Retrograde
Amnesia |
|
The hippocampus and
consolidation |
|
Neural Circuitry and
Biochemistry |
|
Localized neural circuits |
|
Reusable pathways in the brain |
|
Biochemistry |
|
Alteration in synaptic
transmission |
|
Hormones modulating
neurotransmitter systems |
|
Protein synthesis |
|
|
|
|
Figure 7.16 The anatomy
of memory. All the brain structures identified here have been implicated in
efforts to discover the anatomical structures involved in memory. Although its
exact contribution to memory remains the subject of debate, the hippocampus is
thought to play an especially central role in memory.
Photo: Wadsworth collection.
Are There Multiple Memory
Systems?
|
|
|
|
|
Implicit vs. Explicit |
|
Declarative vs. Procedural |
|
Semantic vs. Episodic |