|
|
|
The
tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon involves a temporary inability to remember
something you know and a feeling that the memory is just out of reach. The
tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon shows that recall can often be jogged by
retrieval cues – stimuli that help gain access to memories.
|
|
Context cues can
also facilitate the retrieval of information. It is easier to recall
long-forgotten events, for example, if you return after a number of years to
a place where you used to live.
|
|
Memories are
sketchy reconstructions of the past, which may be distorted and may include
details that did not actually occur.
Research shows that reconstructions can be influenced by new
information–the misinformation effect.
Elizabeth Loftus has shown that eyewitness testimony can be influenced
by information presented to witnesses. Example: showed a video of two cars in
an accident…asked some people how fast the cars were going when they HIT each
other, asked others how fast the cars were going when the SMASHED INTO each
other…a week later asked whether there was any broken glass in the video–the
“smashed into” group said yes, the “hit” group said no.
|
|
The
misinformation effect is explained in part by the unreliability of source
monitoring…the process of making inferences about the origins of
memories…people make decisions at the time of retrieval about where their
memory is coming from (Did I read that in the New York Times or Rolling
Stone?). A source-monitoring error occurs when a memory derived from one
source is misattributed to another source.
|