Slide 1
Sensation and Perception
|
|
|
|
Sensation |
|
stimulation of sense organs |
|
Perception |
|
selection, organization, and
interpretation of sensory input |
The Visual System: The
Stimulus
|
|
|
|
|
Light is a form of electromagnetic
radiation that travels as a wave |
|
Amplitude: perception of brightness |
|
Wavelength: perception of color |
|
Purity: mix of wavelengths |
|
perception of saturation, or richness
of colors. |
|
|
Figure 4.1 Light, the
physical stimulus for vision. (a) Light waves vary in amplitude and wavelength.
(b) Within the spectrum of visible light, amplitude (corresponding to physical
intensity) affects mainly the experience of brightness. Wavelength affects
mainly the experience of color, and purity is the key determinant of
saturation. (c) If white light (such as sunlight) passes through a prism, the
prism separates the light into its component wavelengths, creating a rainbow of
colors. However, visible light is only the narrow band of wavelengths to which
human eyes happen to be sensitive.
The Eye: A Living Optical
Instrument
|
|
|
|
The eye: housing and channeling |
|
Components: |
|
Cornea: where light enters the eye |
|
Lens: focuses the light rays on the
retina |
|
Iris: colored ring of muscle
surrounding the pupil |
|
Pupil: regulates amount of light |
|
|
Figure 4.2 The human eye.
Light passes through the cornea, pupil, and lens and falls on the
light-sensitive surface of the retina, where images of objects are reflected
upside down. The lens adjusts its curvature to focus the images falling on the
retina. The pupil regulates the amount of light passing into the rear chamber
of the eye.
Figure 4.3
Nearsightedness and farsightedness. The pictures on the right simulate how a
scene might look to nearsighted and farsighted people. Nearsightedness occurs
because light from distant objects focuses in front of the retina.
Farsightedness is due to the opposite situation—light from close objects
focuses behind the retina.
Photos: Craig McClain
The Retina: The Brain’s
Envoy in the Eye
|
|
|
|
|
Retina:
neural tissue lining the inside back surface of the eye which absorbs
light, processes images, and sends information to the brain |
|
Optic disk: where the optic nerve
leaves the eye/ blind spot |
|
Receptor cells: |
|
Rods: black and white/low light vision |
|
Cones: color and daylight vision |
|
Adaptation: becoming more or less
sensitive to light as needed |
|
Information processing in they eye: |
|
Receptive fields |
Slide 9
Figure 4.7 Visual
pathways through the brain. (a) Input from the right half of the visual field
strikes the left side of each retina and is transmitted to the left hemisphere
(shown in red). Input from the left half of the visual field strikes the right
side of each retina and is transmitted to the right hemisphere (shown in
green). The nerve fibers from each eye meet at the optic chiasm, where fibers
from the inside half of each retina cross over to the opposite side of the
brain. After reaching the optic chiasm, the major visual pathway projects through
the lateral geniculate nucleus in the thalamus and onto the primary visual
cortex (shown with solid lines). A second pathway detours through the superior
colliculus and then projects through the thalamus and onto the primary visual
cortex (shown with dotted lines). (b) This inset shows a vertical view of how
the optic pathways project through the thalamus and onto the visual cortex in
the back of the brain [the two pathways mapped out in diagram (a) are virtually
indistinguishable from this angle].
Vision and the Brain:
Information Processing
|
|
|
|
|
Early 1960’s: Hubel and Wiesel |
|
Microelectrode recording of axons in
primary visual cortex of animals |
|
Discovered feature detectors: neurons
that respond selectively to very specific features of more complex stimuli |
|
Simple, complex, hypercomplex cells |
|
Groundbreaking research: Nobel Prize in
1981 |
|
Later research: cells specific to faces
in the temporal lobes of monkeys and humans |
|
|
Figure 4.8 Hubel and
Wiesel’s procedure for studying the activity of neurons in the visual cortex. As
the cat is shown various stimuli, a microelectrode records the firing of a
neuron in the cat’s visual cortex. The figure shows the electrical responses of
a visual cell apparently “programmed” to respond to lines oriented vertically.
Viewing the World in
Color
|
|
|
|
Wavelength determines color |
|
Longer = red / shorter = violet |
|
Amplitude determines brightness |
|
Purity determines saturation |
|
|
Figure 4.12 The color
circle and complementary colors. Colors opposite each other on this color
circle are complements, or “opposites.” Additively, mixing complementary colors
produces gray. Opponent process principles help explain this effect as well as
the other peculiarities of complementary colors noted in the text.
Theories of Color Vision
|
|
|
|
Trichromatic theory – Young and
Helmholtz |
|
Receptors for red, green, blue – color
mixing |
|
Opponent Process theory – Hering |
|
3 pairs of antagonistic colors |
|
red/green, blue/yellow, black/white |
|
Current perspective: both theories
necessary |
|
|
Figure 4.14 Reconciling
theories of color vision. Contemporary explanations of color vision include
aspects of both the trichromatic and opponent process theories. As predicted by
trichromatic theory, there are three types of receptors for color—cones
sensitive to short, medium, and long wavelengths. However, these cones are
organized into receptive fields that excite or inhibit the firing of
higher-level visual cells in the retina, thalamus, and cortex. As predicted by
opponent process theory, some of these cells respond in antagonistic ways to
blue versus yellow, red versus green, and black versus white.
Perceiving Forms,
Patterns, and Objects
|
|
|
|
Reversible figures |
|
Perceptual sets |
|
|
|
Gestalt psychologists: the whole is more than the sum of its parts |
|
Reversible figures and perceptual sets
demonstrate that the same visual stimulus can result in very different
perceptions |
Each of these figures can
be seen as two different things. Can you identify them?
A pretty boring video
clip
|
|
|
Count how many times the people in the
black clothes pass the ball. Try to be as accurate as you can. |
|
|
|
The Video |
Figure 4.17 Feature
analysis in form perception. One vigorously debated theory of form perception
is that the brain has cells that respond to specific aspects or features of
stimuli, such as lines and angles. Neurons functioning as higher-level
analyzers then respond to input from these “feature detectors.” The more input
each analyzer receives, the more active it becomes. Finally, other neurons
weigh signals from these analyzers and make a “decision” about the stimulus. In
this way perception of a form is arrived at by assembling elements from the bottom
up.
Figure 4.18 Bottom-up versus top-down processing. As
explained in these diagrams, bottom-up processing progresses from individual
elements to whole elements, whereas top-down processing progresses from the
whole to the individual elements.
Figure 4.19 The principle
of figure and ground. Whether you see two faces or a vase depends on which part
of this drawing you see as figure and which as background. Although this
reversible drawing allows you to switch back and forth between two ways of
organizing your perception, you can’t perceive the drawing both ways at once.
More on Figure-Ground
Perceiving Depth or
Distance
|
|
|
|
Binocular cues – clues from both eyes
together |
|
retinal disparity |
|
Monocular cues – clues from a single
eye |
|
accommodation |
|
pictorial depth cues |
|
|
|
Does size matter? |
|
|
|
|
Principles of Perception
|
|
|
|
Gestalt principles of form perception: |
|
figure-ground, proximity, closure,
similarity, simplicity, and continuity |
|
Perceptual hypotheses |
|
An inference about what form could be
responsible for a pattern of sensory stimulation |
|
Often guided by context |
|
|
Figure 4.20 Gestalt
principles of perceptual organization. Gestalt principles help explain some of
the factors that influence form perception. (a) Proximity: These dots might
well be organized in vertical columns rather than horizontal rows, but because
of proximity (the dots are closer together horizontally), they tend to be
perceived in rows. (b) Closure: Even though the figures are incomplete, you
fill in the blanks and see a circle and a dog. (c) Similarity: Because of
similarity of color, you see dots organized into the number 2 instead of a
random array. If you did not group similar elements, you wouldn’t see the
number 2 here. (d) Simplicity: You could view this as a complicated
11-sided figure, but given the preference for simplicity, you are more likely
to see it as an overlapping rectangle and triangle. (e) Continuity: You tend to
group these dots in a way that produces a smooth path rather than an abrupt
shift in direction.
Figure 4.21 Perceptual
hypotheses. The images projected on the retina are often distorted, shifting
representations of stimuli in the real world, requiring ongoing perceptual
hypotheses about what form could be responsible for a particular pattern of
sensory stimulation. For example, if you look directly down at a small, square
piece of paper on a desk (a), the stimulus (the paper) and the image projected
on your retina will both be square. But as you move the paper away on the
desktop, as shown in (b) and (c), the square stimulus projects an increasingly
trapezoidal image on your retina.
Figure 4.22 A famous
reversible figure. What do you see? Consult the text to learn what the two
possible interpretations of this figure are.
Figure 4.24 Context
effects. The context in which a stimulus is seen can affect your perceptual
hypotheses. The middle character in the word on the left is assumed to be an
“H,” whereas in the word on the right the same character is assumed to be an
“A.” In addition to showing the potential influence of context, this example
shows the power of expectations and top-down processing.
Stability in the
Perceptual World: Perceptual Constancies
|
|
|
|
Perceptual constancies – stable
perceptions amid changing stimuli |
|
Size |
|
Shape |
|
Brightness |
|
Hue |
|
Location in space |
|
|
Optical Illusions: The
Power of Misleading Cues
|
|
|
Optical Illusions – discrepancy between
visual appearance and physical reality |
|
Famous optical illusions: Muller-Lyer Illusion, Ponzo Illusion,
Poggendorf Illusion, Upside-Down T Illusion, Zollner Illusion, the Ames Room,
and Impossible Figures |
|
Cultural differences: Perceptual
hypotheses at work |
|
|
Slide 32
Figure 4.27 The
Müller-Lyer illusion. Go ahead, measure them: the two vertical lines are of
equal length.
Figure 4.29 Four
geometric illusions. Ponzo: The horizontal lines are the same length. Poggendorff:
The two diagonal segments lie on the same straight line. Upside-down T: The
vertical and horizontal lines are the same length. Zollner: The long diagonals
are all parallel (try covering up some of the short diagonal lines if you don’t
believe it).
Figure 4.31 Three classic
impossible figures. The figures are impossible, yet they clearly exist—on the
page. What makes them impossible is that they appear to be three-dimensional
representations yet are drawn in a way that frustrates mental attempts to
“assemble” their features into possible objects. It’s difficult to see the
drawings simply as lines lying in a plane—even though this perceptual
hypothesis is the only one that resolves the contradiction.
Our Sense of Hearing: The
Auditory System
|
|
|
|
Stimulus = sound waves (vibrations of
molecules traveling in air) |
|
Amplitude (loudness) |
|
Wavelength (pitch) |
|
Purity (timbre) |
Figure 4.32 Sound, the
physical stimulus for hearing. (a) Like light, sound travels in waves—in
this case, waves of air pressure. A smooth curve would represent a pure tone,
such as that produced by a tuning fork. Most sounds, however, are complex. For
example, the wave shown here is for middle C played on a piano. The sound wave
for the same note played on a violin would have the same wavelength (or
frequency) as this one, but the “wrinkles” in the wave would be different,
corresponding to the differences in timbre between the two sounds. (b) The
table shows the main relations between objective aspects of sound and
subjective perceptions.
The Auditory System
Sensory Processing in the
Ear
|
|
|
|
External ear (pinna): collects sound |
|
Middle ear: the ossicles (hammer,
anvil, stirrup) |
|
Inner ear: the cochlea |
|
a fluid-filled, coiled tunnel |
|
contains the hair cells, the auditory
receptors |
|
lined up on the basilar membrane |
|
|
The Auditory Pathway
|
|
|
Sound waves vibrate bones of the middle
ear |
|
Stirrup hits against the oval window of
cochlea |
|
Sets the fluid inside in motion |
|
Hair cells are stimulated with the
movement of the basilar membrane |
|
Physical stimulation converted into
neural impulses |
|
Sent through the thalamus to the
auditory cortex (temporal lobes) |
|
|
Figure 4.35 The basilar
membrane. This graphic shows how the cochlea might look if it was unwound and
cut open to reveal the basilar membrane, which is covered with thousands of
hair cells (the auditory receptors). Pressure waves in the fluid filling the
cochlea cause oscillations to travel in waves down the basilar membrane,
stimulating the hair cells to fire. Although the entire membrane vibrates, as
predicted by frequency theory, the point along the membrane where the wave
peaks depends on the frequency of the sound stimulus, as suggested by place
theory.
Auditory Perception:
Theories of Hearing
|
|
|
|
Hermann von Helmholtz (1863) |
|
Place theory |
|
Other researchers (Rutherford, 1886) |
|
Frequency theory |
|
Georg von Bekesy (1947) |
|
Traveling wave theory |
|
|
Taste: The Gustatory
System
|
|
|
|
Taste (gustation) |
|
Physical stimulus: soluble chemical
substances |
|
Receptor cells found in taste buds |
|
Four primary tastes: sweet, sour,
bitter, and salty |
|
Taste: learned and social processes |
|
|
|
|
Figure 4.36 The tongue
and taste. Taste buds are clustered around tiny bumps on the tongue called
papillae. There are three types of papillae, which are distributed as shown
here. The taste buds found in each type of papillae show slightly different
sensitivities to the four basic tastes, as mapped out in the graph at the top.
Thus, sensitivity to the primary tastes varies across the tongue, but these
variations are small and all four primary tastes can be detected wherever there
are taste receptors
Source: Adapted from Bartoshuk, L. M. (1993). Genetic and pathological taste
variation: What can we learn from animal models and human disease? In D.
Chadwick, J. Marsh, & J. Goode (Eds.), The molecular basis of smell and
taste transduction (pp. 251–267). New York: Wiley.
The Chemical Senses:
Smell
|
|
|
|
Smell (Olfaction) |
|
Physical stimuli: substances carried in
the air |
|
dissolved in fluid, the mucus in the
nose |
|
Olfactory receptors = olfactory cilia |
|
Synapse directly with cells in brain |
|
Olfactory sense not routed through
thalamus |
|
|
Figure 4.37 The olfactory
system. Odor molecules travel through the nasal passages and stimulate
olfactory cilia. An enlargement of these hairlike olfactory receptors is shown
in the inset. The olfactory nerves transmit neural impulses through the
olfactory bulb to the brain.
Touch: Sensory Systems in
the Skin
|
|
|
|
Physical stimuli = mechanical, thermal,
and chemical energy coming in contact with the skin |
|
Pathway: Sensory receptors -> the
spinal cord -> brainstem -> thalamus -> somatosensory cortex
(parietal lobe) |
|
Sensory receptors specialized to some
degree for different functions, such as pressure, heat, cold, etc. |
|
Pain receptors: free nerve endings |
|
Two pain pathways: fast vs. slow |
|
Gate-control theory |
|
|
Figure 4.38 Receptive
field for touch. A receptive field for touch is an area on the skin surface
that, when stimulated, affects the firing of a cell that responds to pressure
on the skin. Shown here is a center-surround receptive field for a cell in the
thalamus of a monkey, originally described by Mountcastle and Powell (1959).
Receptive fields for touch come in a variety of sizes and functional
arrangements.
Figure 4.39 Pathways for
pain signals. Pain signals are sent inward from receptors to the brain along
the two ascending pathways depicted here in red and black. The fast pathway,
shown in red, and the slow pathway, shown in black, depend on different types
of nerve fibers and are routed through different parts of the thalamus. The
gate control mechanism hypothesized by Melzack and Wall (1965) apparently
depends on signals in a descending pathway (shown in green) that originates in
an area of the midbrain.