Pre-Columbian Art

Professor Jolly

Spring 2009

Research Paper

 

Due: April 23rd

Your research paper (6-8 pages) will build on your initial analysis of one or two of the Pre-Columbian Art objects from the Handwerker Gallery.  Your starting point should be your visual analysis of the content and form of the work; now it is time to put this analysis into an art historical and cultural context.  As you continue to research and ask questions of your object, be sure to consider a range of Òways to knowÓ about your chosen object.  With most of these works, the archeological record is going to be the most difficult to access, and while you can make educated analogies with other works we have studied, you will largely have to rely on other means of inquiry.  For example, you might research the form of the object in terms of its production (which helps you understand its material history), as well as its style (which might let you understand a range of historical influences and points of comparison with cultures of the region).  Meanwhile, you might explore the content, or iconography, of the image in terms of comparisons with other art objects, zoology, botany, medicine or even ethnography.  Ask yourself if there are any ethnographic analogies you might use to make sense of the object.  Finally, you should take time to learn what you can about the culture that produced the object, and consider how the work might have functioned or held meaning in its larger cultural context. 

 

My expectations:

  1. An engaging and well-written 6-8 page paper, which combines careful visual analysis, research, and insight into the significance of your chosen work.

 

  1. A clearly articulated thesis (or hypothesis), which is systematically argued and supported with both visual evidence and scholarly sources. 

 

  1. Much of your argument will be generated through visual comparisons.  Thus, plan to include images of the key artworks or illustrations to which you compare your object.  If you are willing to share your drawing/photo of the Johnson museum object, that would be appreciated!  Images can be in black and white or color, and should include a figure # as well as a caption with the culture (if appropriate), title, date (as available), and image source.  Please organize your photocopies or digital printouts, either within the text or as a batch at the end of the document, by number.  When referring to works of art in your text, their titles should be in italics; if the images have very similar names, refer to their locations (museum names) to help reader keep track.

 

  1. Sequentially numbered, footnote-format citations (see the Chicago Manuel of Style) for quotes and ideas taken from other sources.  For example, a citation for a book should look like this.[1]  A citation for an article within a book should look like this.[2]  An article within a journal looks like this.[3]  A second citation of a source can be abbreviated.[4]  Note that your word processing program likely has an ÒinsertÓ footnote function, which automatically numbers your citations in sequence and keeps track as you move things around.  Unlike bibliography format, you put the author first name first, use commas, put publication date and publisher within parentheses, and only cite the specific page from which you are getting your quote or information.  Note: do not weigh your paper down with other peopleÕs words (quotes); I prefer you paraphrase key ideas you engage with from your sources, and put them in your own words.  Still, of course, cite your source for the supporting idea.  Save quotes for wording that you find particularly compelling, and explain to me, in your own words, what key ideas you draw from the quote.

 

  1. At least five scholarly sources.  Scholarly sources include books from University presses and museums, as well as articles from academic, juried journals.  Online databases like J-STOR and ANTHROSOURCE should provide links to and citations of academic sources.  Websites are not automatically considered scholarly sources; many are very unreliable and misleading.  So if you would like to cite one, you should first check it with me.   

 

  1. Original work.

 

Art history databases are limited in their indexing of Pre-Columbian materials, but certainly try them; see Òresearch by subjectÓ guide on the library homepage.

 

The Anthropology Òresearch by subjectÓ guide will be most helpful.

 

 

 



[1] Rebecca Stone-Miller, Art of the Andes: from Chav’n to Inca, 2nd edition (London: Thames and Hudson, 2002): 60-61. 

[2] Donald A. Proulx, ÒRitual Uses of Trophy Heads in Ancient Nasca Society,Ó in Ritual Sacrifice in Ancient Peru, E. P. Benson and A. G. Cook, editors (Austin: University of Texas, 2001): 121.

[3] Mary Weismantel, ÒMoche Sex Pots,Ó American Anthropologist, v.106, no.3 (September 2004): 495.

[4] Stone-Miller, 75.