This meeting will bring together international scientists and practitioners
from NATO member, Partner and Mediterranean Dialogue countries to identify
the key weaknesses in higher education for addressing issues of environmental
security and sustainability challenges. This workshop will: 1) inform university
professors how to adapt their curriculum and teaching strategies, 2) produce
university graduates that are more capable of prioritizing, evaluating and
managing environmental issues through exposure to a holistic approach to solving
environmental problems, 3) strengthen ties among practicing environmental
scientists, managers, and government officials, and 4) increase collaboration
among faculty in higher education and between colleagues in NATO member, Partner
and Mediterranean Dialogue countries. The teaching of environmental studies
is well developed in North America and Western Europe where the principles
of sustainable development are taken into account in teaching environmental
problem solving. The approach is interdisciplinary with a focus on integrating
the physical and natural sciences with the social sciences. Yet, these countries
face additional challenges to address issues of unsustainable resource use,
which in the area of energy, for example, poses an enormous risk to environmental
security. In transition countries, this teaching approach has yet to develop
and mature. Most environmental teaching focuses heavily on the sciences with
little integration with other disciplines, specifically the social sciences.
This workshop will begin to develop a broader based approach to the teaching
of environmental studies by identifying the most significant health and environmental
issues; addressing environmental security and sustainability issues within
the local socio-economic constraints; identifying and prioritizing the most
cost-effective educational strategies; promoting effective decision-making;
and, making the best use of limited resources to achieve the greatest net
environmental benefit.
These goals will be achieved by holding several sessions that: identify and
discuss methods, results and strategies for conducting environmental and sustainability
education; identify and present methods and techniques to use non-traditional
methods of environmental education to focus on priority issues to achieve
the greatest environmental and educational benefit; and, identify and discuss
the most advanced pedagogic tools that can be implemented within the constraints
faced by individual countries. In addition, there will be two working group
sessions that discuss these issues and reach consensus on the best methods
for prioritization, assessment and management of issues, for incorporation
in the workshop book. A field trip to a nearby recently designated national
park facing pressures of agriculture, forestry and recreation will serve as
the basis of small-group case study work in interdisciplinary problem-solving
with multiple stake-holders.
The ARW will contribute to the international knowledge related to prioritization
of environmental education for promoting environmental security and sustainability
issues. While the focus will be to assist transition countries, the tools
will be equally important in developed countries through the cross-fertilization
of ideas and experiences. Members of the organizing committee have active
collaborations in developing countries, and many of the invited participants
are expected to establish close working relationships. In fact, it has been
proven that these meetings promote close working relationships between participating
scientists which will continue long after the conclusion of the workshop,
and which should further advance the application and realization of approaches
developed during the workshop. For example, the idea to organize this ARW
arose during Working Group sessions at the NATO ARW workshop on Enhancing
Environmental Security in Transition Countries (Sibiu, Romania, 2006).
To our knowledge, there has been no specific effort that addresses the role
of higher education in promoting environmental security, and no venue for
academics and government policy makers to jointly discuss how to conduct research
and teach students such that all countries, and especially transitional countries,
will be more equipped to tackle complex matters of environmental security.
Meetings and workshops in professional organizations rarely bring together
academics and policy makers. This NATO-sponsored ARW would allow us to identify
and convene the best educators, thinkers, and policy makers in this area to
collectively address this very important pedagogical shortcoming in higher
education and in environmental security.