Posted by Thomas Shevory at 8:37AM
|
6 comments
In my Constitutionalism class, we’ve been covering First Amendment issues related to religion. My students seem especially interested in the topic. Turo tells me that this is because religion was suppressed during the state socialist years. Now, while Mongolia is nominally Buddhist, religious meanings and practices are generally not well-defined or understood.
This makes for some interesting exchanges. For instance, with the Establishment Clause cases involving public school prayer, I had to explain what a prayer is. My students were unfamiliar with the concept of a recited prayer, such as the Lord’s Prayer, which was the subject of Abington School District v. Schempp (1963).
Free Exercise cases offer a tour through some distinctively American religious sects. The first considered whether Congress could ban polygamy in the Utah Territory. (It could.) My students have some familiarity with the plaintiffs, given that there are, by some accounts, 8,000 Mormon missionaries in UB.
The Jehovah’s Witnesses were a party to no less than 40 Supreme Court cases, nearly all of which they won. (You have to admire their persistence.) Arguably, their most significant contribution to constitutional history, West Virginia v. Barnett (1948), confirmed that American school children could forego the Pledge to the Flag in school if it violated their religious convictions. Turo said that the Pledge reminded him of Mongolian state socialism.
Through a discussion of Free Exercise, I was able to introduce my students to Seventh Day Adventists, Pentecostal snake handlers, Native American peyote eaters, and various other religious groups and rituals. Teaching this material from a distance, you begin to note that the U.S. is, if nothing else, a land of religious imagination and enthusiasm.
The case that attracted the most discussion was Wisconsin vs. Yoder (1972). Amish parents, after refusing to send their children to school past the eighth grade, were fined by state authorities. My Mongolian students could not seem to get their heads around the idea that a group of people would willingly choose to live without automobiles, television sets, cells phones, and the other accoutrements of modern life. (The population of Mongolia is, by the way, one-third nomadic).
As always there were questions: Did other students in the state still have to attend high school? Yes. Did the decision mean that Amish parents were barred from sending their children to higher grades? No. What if the child of an Amish parent wanted to go to high school, but the parent prevented it? Good question. Not sure. But, as I explained, some interesting cases have involved parents who have tried to withhold potentially life-saving medical treatment from their children on religious grounds.
We were ten minutes over. I'd get back to them.
6 Comments