![]() |
ESP StudentsBy, for, and about students in the Environmental Studies/Science Program |
Monday, December 3, 2007
Hello from Costa Rica! For those of you who don’t already know, I am studying abroad this semester with the School For Field Studies at the Centro Estudios sobre Desarrollo Sostenible (Center for Sustainable Development Studies), in Atenas Costa Rica. I just have two weeks left, but I thought I would share a reflection I wrote after returning from our recent trip to Nicaragua. I am feeling now, as I have many times since having chosen to major in Environmental Studies, the incredible weight of responsibility that comes with knowledge. The more things you know, the more things you have seen, the more responsibility you have to act in some way upon that knowledge. Our trip to Nicaragua was a five day whirlwind through a country with of extreme contrasts. Our days were packed full from 5:45 am to 11:00pm some nights, and moving from one activity to the next in rapid succession left my brain exhausted and overwhelmed. After about five hours of driving through Costa Rica we passed through La Cruz, and I began to observe what I could from the window of the bus. As I was doing so, I spent a lot of time wondering how representative this roadside snapshot actually was of all of Nicaragua. After 2 hours at the border, we arrived at the shore of Lake Nicaragua and bordered a ferry to Ometepe Island. The 2 hour bus ride from the port to the biological field station where were staying took us past miles and miles of extreme poverty, people living in open shacks, farm animals running around everywhere, trash piles burning. When we arrived to the field station we found beautiful maintained lawns, hammocks, clean rooms with tiled floors and a delicious dinner. What a contrast. Granada A large, colorful colonial city with many cathedrals, red tile roofs, and pastel painted buildings. I realized most of us loved it because it reminded us of something we would see in Europe. We stayed here for the last three days of our trip, right in the glitzy historic center of the city. None of us ventured out far from the 5 block radius of the central park and main strip of businesses because it was...well...sketchy, and dark. We didn’t feel safe going there, away from the lights, into the unknown, into the less developed areas of the city. So we didn’t. Our discomfort prevented us from really understanding the city. The next morning we went to La Chureca, the largest trash dump in the country. This huge dump is actually the home of 1,500 people, who live off of, and work for the dump. I felt ridiculous as the 38 of us filed down the road through the thick smoke of burning trash, trying not to gawk at the shacks, literally built out of trash, that were strewn about on top of the dump. The neighborhoods went on and on. I learned later that the life expectancy for people living there is 30 years. Our purpose there was to visit the school, give some donations in terms of supplies, but for the most part just to play with the kids. As soon as we walked in the door, every one of had at least one child attached, some had four or five. These children just wanted some love, and I was amazed at the forwardness with which my attachment, Elissa, jumped into my arms and nuzzled into my neck, from which position she did not leave until I had to pry her off, 2 hours later, when it came time for us to leave. We left covered in grimy handprints, sweat, and grime collected just from walking through the air. As we all reached for the hand sanitizer once we clambered back onto the bus, it was impossible to internalize what kind of feelings the experience had invoked in me. I didn't know whether to feel pity, disgust, appreciation for having had my eyes opened, or just a lot of guilt. I felt mostly guilt, and a deep sense of profound helplessness at the bigness of the problem and my inability to do anything real about it. We immediately drove to a huge artisans market where we were thrust in for two hours of touristic consumerism. I was so thrown off by the contrast of the two experiences that I mostly just wandered around aimlessly, feeling increasingly overwhelmed by the knowledge of the fact that this was an excellent place to purchase quality, locally made souvenirs for people at home, but in the end only ended up making a couple of purchases. The Parks We visited three different parks in Nicaragua, Maderas, Masaya, and Mambacho. The main attraction of these parks was the impressive volcanoes. Each park had a different management system. Maderas was not much more than a ‘paper’ park. Little management is actually done to enforce any rules that go along with being a protected area. I talked to our tour guide in Mombacho about the differences between a publicly and privately managed park. This is what he told me. Masaya is a publicly owned and managed park. The road to get there was long, sufficiently isolating it from any practical community interaction. Because of its public status, the government can choose to hire guides from anywhere they want, and the money gained is all reabsorbed into the government budget, not necessarily benefiting surrounding communities. Our guide favored Mambacho because it is public land, but it is privately managed. Because of this they are much more connected to the community. All the guides that work there are hired from the local high school and put through a job training program on park management. All of the extra profit that the park makes from tourism goes back to 8 local schools. Coffee farms are located all around the park, which adds local economic value to the area. For this reason, this co-management arrangement seems to be far more beneficial to the community than what we saw at Masaya. The management plans are similar to those we have seen at parks in Costa Rica, such as Poas, La Fortuna, and Monteverde. The main difference I have noticed is that there are usually Costa Ricans in their parks. Educational groups, families, etc. There are still less locals than tourists, but in Nicaragua, I didn’t see any locals at all. These places are constructed for tourists. We didn’t see a single Nicaraguan at either of the regulated parks, aside from the employees. The only place we saw Nicaraguans was at Maderas, where rules are not regulated. Parks are invested in primarily to attract tourist dollars. This observation really made me think about whether tourism is actually good or bad for Nicaragua. It brings money to the economy, and gives them a practical incentive to protect the environment, but if it is all for tourists, is it taking away from cultural value? Looking out the window of the bus as we drove to and from the parks, observing the extreme poverty, the "real nicaragua", just made me confused for the most part. I felt out of place to be a tourist there, like I had no right. To me it seems that the impacts of tourism for Nicaragua are only really taken advantage of by those who are less poor. The government, and private interests who have the money to invest in creating tourist services are the only ones that seemed to really be benefiting. As we drove from one touristic site to the next, what I saw was poverty. I did not see a people who were benefiting from the presence of our touristic presence in their country. I don't know what conclusions I can really draw from the experience- or if there are even any conclusions to be drawn. The world is a big place, a lot happens in it, and all I know definitely from this experience is that now I know about more of those things that are happening. I know that a certain responsibility comes with this knowledge. A responsibility to do something, to change something, or at least to care. I don't really know where I fit into all of that, but I do know that this trip to Nicaragua was an eye opening experience, one that was essential in grounding the idealism that exists in our isolated academic world firmly into reality.
Monday, December 3, 2007
Hi everyone. If you can read this, then the blog is working. Please try it out! --Susanne