In our work on calculus, we have identified a number of unifying
threads that typically run through a successful first-year
course. We have noted with interest that a number of other
groups of mathematicians working on revitalizing calculus have
identified similar themes. We label our threads graphical calculus,
distance and velocity, multiple representation of functions, modeling,
top-down analysis, and approximation and estimation. We give
a brief description of each thread below.
We describe these themes as "threads" because they are
woven throughout the course, and serve to bind it together into
a unified whole. Most of the projects, and many of the activities
contain elements from more than one of the threads. In an
appendix to the Instructor's Guide to Calculus, An Active
Approach with Projects we include guides to the relationships
between the projects and activities in the volume and the corresponding
threads.
This idea also helps students see the unity of calculus. For
instance finding the area under a graph, finding the
antiderivative of a function, and computing a Riemann sum from a
table of values are all examples of the concept of integration.
We emphasize the interplay of all representations. If we have a
result for a function some typical questions from the instructor
are "What if you were given a graph? Then what does this result
tell you? What if you were given a table of values? What does
this result mean? Describe this situation in English."
Modeling is introduced early by way of classroom activities.
Graphical relationships are the first instance of modeling. For
example, in class students are asked to create and analyze a
graphical model of the height of a flag from the ground as a
function of time as the flag is being raised.
The students use modeling techniques on the projects. For
example, in a Calculus 1 project, students are asked to model the
motion for a detector that is guarding a hallway against
intruders.
This emphasis on modeling in class and in the projects seems to
have strengthened the students' belief that it is possible to
construct functions that model even complex situations and that
the concepts presented in calculus are valuable tools in this
process. Furthermore, it seems to have significantly reduced the
students' fear of word problems.
We spend some class time introducing the top-down approach to
problem solving, and examples in class are approached top down
whenever appropriate. ("What things do I need to know? ...
Now, what do I need to do in order to know these things? ...'')
We emphasize using this approach on any large problem. Most
projects are designed to be attacked in a top-down fashion.
Students don't need to discover "big" solutions if they can
combine small solutions to solve big problems.
Students are also asked to compute Riemann sums and finite
differences from tables of values and solve certain problems
using these numerical estimates. Indeed, the students view some
modeling experiences as estimation or approximation of a "real"
situation. They also see Taylor polynomials and/or other
functions obtained from curve fitting serving as approximations
to the original function, which may be used in place of the
original function under certain conditions. Finally, where
appropriate, estimation is stressed in connection with common
sense. That is, students are asked if their answers to problems
make sense. In this way, "mathematical" common sense is both
developed and reinforced.
Back to exerpts from the Instructor's Guide
Back to Ithaca College Calculus Project Home Page
This page maintained by: D. Schwartz, Ithaca College
schwartz@ithaca.edu
Last Modified: January 8, 2000