POLT 40102-01, Seminar (Comparative/Int'l Studies)

Missionaries for Democracy
The missionary impulse and US democracy promotion

Fall 2011

Wednesday, 3-5:30pm
Phillips Room, Muller Chapel

Prof. Chip Gagnon
324 Muller Center
Office hours: Tu-Th 9:20-10:30am
and by appointment
tel. 274-1103
e-mail:
course web site: www.ithaca.edu/gagnon/seminar/

Last revised 9/28/2011



Description

Democracy promotion has been a major goal of US foreign policy since the 1980s. Both Democratic and Republican administrations have seen the spread of liberal democracy as an important part of ensuring US interests in a stable and secure world, but have also asserted that liberal democracy is the best form of government for every country in the world. Since the 1980s, the US has funded numerous governmental and nongovernmental efforts to achieve this goal.

In this seminar we will address the questions of why and how the US tries to spread democracy around the world. Given how often US democracy promoters are spoken of as missionaries, we’ll address this question through comparing democracy promotion to traditional religious missionary work, considering the similarities and differences between the two.

In the first part of the semester we'll consider missionary work, especially among North American natives in the 17th century and US missionary efforts around the world in the 19th and 20th centuries. We'll also discuss the concept of conversion, as well as some theoretical ways of thinking about mission work.

Then we'll explore democracy promotion. We'll first talk about the definitions of democracy, then whether democracy “travels” across cultures, the relationship of democracy promoters to target societies, and we'll look at some case studies of democracy promotion in Southeastern Europe. One of the questions we are seeking to answer is whether and how democracy promotion is similar to missionary work.

By juxtaposing these two types of activities we should get a better understanding of the processes that are behind US (and other countries') efforts to promote democracy around the world.

Although the first part of the course is heavily historical, I am not presuming any prior knowledge of missionaries or of early North American history, nor of democracy promotion in general.



Readings

The following books are required. These books are available at Buffalo Street Books downtown. Though I know you have other options for buying your books, I'm strongly urging that you buy them at Buffalo Street Books, the last of Ithaca's independent bookstores, now a member-owned cooperative. BSB will not charge you sales tax on these books, nor is there a shipping/delivery fee. They will be delivered to you in person on the second day of class.

Checking against Amazon.com, the total cost of these books is the same from BSB ($148) as from Amazon, with the added convenience of the books being delivered (for free) directly to you in person.

They can all be ordered, by telephone (607) 273-8246, or preferably, by email ( BuffaloStreetBooks@hotmail.com ).

If you preorder they will be delievered to class on our second class meeting, September 14.

When you place your order, be sure to state your name, contact information (telephone or email), what class (Gagnon, Seminar) you're ordering for, the books being ordered, and your credit card number including expiration date. They accept MC, VISA and Discover (no AmEx). Confirmation will be sent by email. Of course, if you would like to shop in an actual very cool independent bookstore, you can make your purchases in person. The bookstore is located on Buffalo Street, between Cayuga & Tioga in the Dewitt Mall.

  • Keith Brown (editor), Transacting transition: The micropolitics of democracy assistance in the former Yugoslavia
  • Thomas Carothers, Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve
  • Kimberley Coles, Democratic Designs: International Intervention and Electoral Practices in Post-War Bosnia
  • William Hutchison, Errand to the World: American Protestant Thought and Foreign Missions
  • Frederic Schaffer, Democracy in Translation: Understanding Politics in an Unfamiliar Culture
  • Charles Tilly, Democracy
  • Doing the readings

    Since this is an upper-level seminar most of our time will be spent discussing the assigned readings in light of the questions posed above.  I therefore expect you all to have done the readings before each class.

    What does "doing the readings" mean?

    It doesn't mean just sitting down and mechanically going through the articles and books; that's a sure way to make even an interesting text boring.

    Reading is an active and interactive process between the reader and the text. If you're really reading a text you are also reacting to it. I've included a wide range of texts in order to provoke a wide range of responses from readers.

    Reading should also be a reflective process. To really understand an article deeply it is usually necessary to read it and think about it, and then read it again, and think about it again, and discuss it with others, write about it and read it yet again. I've found that even after many readings, when I read a text in order to explain it to someone else I get new perspectives on the author's arguments and assumptions, on the text's strengths and weaknesses.

    So when I say "do the readings," I mean "engage yourself with the ideas of the text." I understand that some of the texts are quite complex and that not all of them are entertaining. But struggle is part of the reading experience. If something's not clear, if it's confusing, talk about it with others outside of class, and/or bring it up in class. As I mentioned above, taking notes on a text while you read it or re-read it is also a very good way to engage the text and to make sure you understand it.

    One way to think about this is to look at the readings as stories.  The authors are telling us a story about something.  What is the focus of each story?  What happens in each story?  Why?
     

    Grading

  • Class participation (25%) Learning is an active process; if you think about the things you've learned the best, they're usually things that you haven't sat back passively and "absorbed," but rather things that you learned by actively taking part and practicing. So too with critical thinking. I therefore expect each of you to be active participants in your learning. This is especially important in a seminar. To be an effective participant means having done the readings and being prepared to take part in discussions. Your class participation grade will be based on a combination of attendance, participation, and being prepared.
  • Short reactions to readings (35%) Each week I'll ask you to do a short (3-4 page) reaction to the assigned readings. In the papers you should briefly summarize the main points of the reading(s) and then give your reaction, analysis, etc.
  • Research paper (40%): A 20-25 page paper focusing on a topic related to the themes of the seminar. I expect you to meet with me to discuss ideas. I am very open to the topic of the paper, as long as it is related to the themes of the course. The 40% includes not just the final paper but the other assignments leading up to it (see below).
  • I expect that you'll meet with me to discuss possible topics, sources, etc. I expect you to use a range of sources, at least 15 and preferrably more: journal articles, books, and if available, good web sources. A written proposal is due by Friday November 11; an annotated bibliography by Friday December 9, and a literature review by Friday December 16. In class on December 14 you will be expected to make a brief presentation to the class on your research project, tying it into the themes of the semester and leading a discussion on it. The final paper is due during finals week, on Thursday December 22 by 4pm. I will be handing out in class a detailed description of these written assignments. Be sure to check out the Guidelines for the proposal, annotated bibliograpny, and lit review, that I handed out in class.
    Here are some useful links:
  • Guide to Researching a paper, from Cornell Univ. library
  • How to write an annotated bibliography, from Cornell Univ. library
  • Literature Review: Tips from the University of Toronto
  • How to do a literature review from NC A&T State University
  • Writing a Literature Review - What Is a Literature Review and Writing the Review from Wesleyan University Library.

  • Reading assignments

    W 9/7 Introduction

    Questions and answers: what is democracy? what are missionaries? why the attempt to spread religion and political systems? What is conversion? Is religious conversion different than political conversion? If so, how and why?


    W 9/14 America's mission to the world? Democracy promotion and US foreign policy

    Issues to think about:

    What are the arguments for the US having democracy promotion as a key goal? Based on these texts and documents, how exactly does a country become democratic? What is the role of the US in that process? How successful has the US been? How is that success measured or determined?

    Required reading:

    - Muravchik. excerpts from Exporting Democracy, in CR, pp.1-75
    - 1999 Bill Clinton, "United States Strategic Plan for Itnernational Affairs: Strategic Goal: Democracy and Human Rights," in CR p.76
    - National Security Strategy of the United States, September 2002 excerpts in CR pp.77-80
    - National Security Strategy of the United States, March 2006 excerpts in CR pp.81-86
    - National Security Strategy of the United States, May 2010 excerpts in CR after page 86


    W 9/21 Missionaries in 17th century North America

    The readings for tody are a collection of 5 articles focused on European missionary interactions with Native peoples, in New England and New France. Please take your time reading these. I'd suggest reading each one separately over the course of the week rather than trying to read them all at the same time.

    Issues to think about:
    North American settlement was intimately linked to missionary efforts. Indeed, the United States looks to the Puritan settlers at Plymouth as the original "founding fathers," and the religious imagery of America as the City upon the Hill is one that is still with us today. Thus, looking at these initial interactions between missionaries and native peoples may tell us not only about history, but also something about that part of US identity that draws on these early interactions.

    These readings also raise important, more general issues regarding this kind of intercultural interaction. Because of the different nature of French Jesuit missionary activity among the native peoples of New France, articles on that topic focus on some of these more general issues.

    For each of these articles, I've included a couple of specific questions. Please also think about these broader questions as you are reading them:
    - What was the goal of the missionaries?
    - How did they define "success"?
    - Why were they pursuing those goals?
    - How were they attempting to achieve them?
    - What was their relationship or attitude towards their intended targets?
    - Did their efforts achieve the intended goals? Why or why not?
    - What was the attitude of the natives towards the missionaries? Why?
    - Do you sense a difference in attitudes towards natives between the French and the English? If so, what is the difference?
    - What was the effect of missionary activity on native societies?
    - What was the effect on the English and French?

    Required reading:

    - Salisbury, "Red Puritans: The 'Praying Indians' of Massachusetts Bay and John Eliot", pp.87-114.
    Some background on the Puritan missionary efforts and on the relationship in their eyes of culture and religious conversion.
    Why did Eliot establish "praying towns"?

    - Bross, "The Mission upon a Hill: New England Evangalism 1643-1653" pp.115-130.
    What is Bross's argument about the purpose of the New England Mission? How was it related to English identity(ies)?

    - Morrison, "Discourse and the Accomodation of Values: Toward a Revision of Mission History" pp.131-148.
    Think about the challenge of cross-cultural communication and conversion.

    - Conkling, "Legitimacy and conversion in social change: The case of French missionaries and the Northeastern Algonkian" pp.149-172.
    Why were the French successful in their efforts to convert the Wabanaki?

    - Richter, "Iroquois versus Iroquois: Jesuit missions and Christianity in village politics, 1642-1686" pp.173-188.
    Think about the effect of missionaries on the internal dynamics of the target villages/societies.


    W 9/28 US missions late 19th and early 20th century: From the religious to the secular?

    Starting in the early 1800s US religious denominations began to send missionaries abroad. As the Protestant religious denominations began to split between more liberal and conservative theologies, so too did the missionary movement reflect that split. By the early 1900s the mainstream, liberal Protestant denominations came to see their mission in more secular terms, and as Hutchison points out, one could see the large number of purely secular US NGOs currently operating around the world as heirs to those religious missions.

    Required reading:

    - Hutchison, Errand to the World, Introduction, Chapters 3-7, Afterward

    In class:
    "Round Trip Mission"
    Link of interest:
    - Round Trip Mission website

    Issues to think about
    - Think about the relationship between missionaries and US foreign policy goals in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Did the missionaries see themselves as agents of US empire? What were their motivations and goals?
    - Think also about the evolution of the theology behind missions, and the shifts in relationships and attitudes towards target populations over time.


    W 10/5 The issue of conversion

    Conversion is obviously a key concept when we think about missionaries. But what does it mean? How does it happen? How does it differ from syncretism? What is the relationship between one's prior beliefs and world views and those after conversion? Conversion also raises the issue of intercultural communication. Finally, to what extent is the goal of conversion more about the missionary him/herself than about the target persons?

    As you are thinking and reading about religious conversion, please also think about whether this concept is relevant for the political sphere, that is, is a change in political views a kind of conversion?

    Required reading:

    - Bilodeau, "'They honor our Lord among themselves in their own way': Colonial Christianity and the Illinois Indians" pp.189-214.
    Think about translation of concepts. Why were the Jesuits willing to accept the natives' culture and previous religion? Why do you think this was so different from the Protestant English in New England? What did it mean for an Illinois to convert?

    - Austin-Broos, "The Anthropology of Conversion: An introduction" pp.215-221

    - Norris, "Converting to What? Embodied Culture and the Adoption of New Beliefs" pp.222-227

    - Coleman, "Continuous Conversion? The Rhetoric, Practice, and Rhetorical Practice of Charismatic Protestant Conversion" pp.228-234


    W 10/12 Defining Democracy

    In order to understand the challenges involved in promoting and spreading democracy, we first have to have an understanding of what exactly democracy is, and how it comes into being. Tilly uses historical and contemporary examples to explain how and why liberal democracy comes to be established.

    Required reading:

    - Tilly, Democracy

    To think about
    As you are reading Tilly, think about:
    - What is the definition of democracy? How would you determine whether a country is democratic?
    - How and why do countries become liberal democracies?
    - How does Tilly's analysis compare to the Muravchik reading we did for September 9?
    - Is the spread of democracy is comparable to the spread of a religious belief? Does the concept of conversion that we've discussed have any relevance for political ideology?
    - Based on Tilly's arguments, how would one go about trying to promote and spread democracy? Is anything we've learned about religious missionary activity relevant here?


     

    W 10/19 Democracy promotion

    As we discussed at the start of the semester, democracy promotion is a key goal of US foreign policy. Carothers provides background on this policy, including history, types of democracy promotion, and effects. As you read these texts, compare how Carothers and democracy promotors talk about democracy and democratization to: a) Tilly's analysis of democracy; b) Muravchik's way of talking about the spread of democracy; c) the activities of religious missionaries.

    Required reading:

    - Carothers, Aiding Democracy Abroad: The Learning Curve, chapters 1, 2, 3,4 5, 6, 8, 12


    W 10/26 Democracy promotion continued

    These articles present some arguments for specific policies of democracy promotion, including rebuttals of arguments against it.

    Also included below are links to the main US institutions that carry out and fund policies of democratization. Go to those links and see how they present themselves as well as their projects on democratization.

    - Fukuyama and McFaul, "Should Democracy Be Promoted or Demoted?" (pdf) and pp.235-258
    - Carothers, "The Backlash against democracy promotion" pp.259-272
    - Carothers, "Democracy Promotion under Obama: Finding a way forward" (pdf) and pp.273-280

    Links to check out:
    - National Endowment for Democracy
    - USAID: Projects on Democracy and Governance
    - National Democratic Institute
    - International Republican Institute

    To think about
    What do proponents of democracy promotion see as missing in the countries they are targeting? How do they see themselves as providing those missing elements? How do they evaluate the success of their projects?


    W 11/2: TBA


    W 11/9 Democracy promotion and culture

    Proponents of spreading liberal democracy claim that it is a universally valid ideology and political system, based on universal values. Others argue that it is actually a culturally specific political form. This reading looks at how the concept of democracy translates into a nonwestern context.

    As you read Schaffer, think about the arguments and assumptions of the authors above, as well as the experiences of the religious missionaries and their targets that we discussed in the first part of the course. What are the implications of Schaffer's findings for the promotion of democracy by the US and other western states?

    Required reading:

    - Schaffer, Democracy in Translation: Understanding politics in an unfamiliar culture

    Friday 11/11 Proposal for research paper due


    W 11/16 On the ground: Democracy promotion in Southeastern Europe

    Contrast the way democracy promotion is talked about in the previous classes' readings and links, and what these authors find when they look into the actual way in which democracy assistance is done on the ground.

    Required reading:
    Note: Please read the introductions to each of these chapters by Keith Brown
    - Brown, Chapter 1, in Transacting Transition
    - Merritt, Chapter 2, in Transacting Transition
    - Nuti, Chapter 4, in Transacting Transition
    - Sneed, Chapter 5, in Transacting Transition
    - Gagnon, "International NGOs in Bosnia-Herzegovina: Attempting to Build Civil Society" pp.281-293
    - Gagnon, Chapter 8, in Transacting Transition


    W 11/30 - W 12/7  The case of Bosnia

    - W 11/30 Required reading:
    Cole, Democratic Designs: International intervention and electoral practices in postwar Bosnia-Herzegovina, pp.1-112


    - W 12/7 Required reading:
    Cole, Democratic Designs, pp.115-245

    Friday 12/9 Annotated Bibliography for research paper due


    W 12/14 Presentations on research projects

    Friday 12/16 Literature Review due




    Thursday 12/22: Research papers due 4pm (finals week)


    Last revised 9/28/2011
    Return to Chip's page