Saturday, 10:30 am–12:00 pm
Monroe 216

Analysis and Performance

Chair: Jonathan Dunsby (Eastman School of Music)

  • Primary Metrical Dissonance in Early Scriabin and What It Means to an Interpreter
    Aleksandra Vojcic
  • Hypermetric Defiance in the Finale of Beethoven’s Concerto, op. 15: Communicating Musical Process through Performance
    Richard Bass and Neal Larrabee (University of Connecticut)
  • Program

    Primary Metrical Dissonance in Early Scriabin and What It Means to an Interpreter

    Deviations from the metrical implications of a notated time signature are here considered primary metrical dissonances.  Unlike Krebs’s metrical dissonance types, these are not temporary, nor do they arise after a primary metrical consonance (represented by the time signature) is already established.  Scriabin’s early preludes are replete with Type A metrical dissonances as defined by Krebs, but a number of his preludes are written with quixotic instructions to the performer, instructions that are frequently inaccurate metrically and/or rhythmically.  Using Scriabin’s piano-roll recordings as an aid, we can infer that the composer is engaging in a form of self-analysis with respect to the notation of two different types of rubato.  The “expressive anticipation” of a melodic line is carried to an extreme in those preludes in which the left hand is entirely notated out of sync with the right hand (Type A rubato).  Displacement of the entire texture (Type B rubato) is present in works like op. 11, no. 21, which is also notated in a unique composite meter of <3/4, 5/4, 3/4, 6/4>.  This paper shows how Scriabin’s approximate and convenient time-signature notation reflects a performing bias on the part of Scriabin and classifies his preludes according to rubato types and notational idiosyncrasies.

    Top

    Hypermetric Defiance in the Finale of Beethoven’s Concerto, op. 15: Communicating Musical Process through Performance

    The opening theme from the finale of Beethoven’s Piano Concerto No. 1 exhibits irregular phrase rhythms that present an interpretive dilemma for soloist and conductor.  This study, presented jointly by a theorist and a pianist, illustrates how a large-scale formal process revealed through analysis can explain the structure and function of the opening theme within the movement as a whole.  It further demonstrates how an understanding of that process can assist in making interpretive decisions that will result in a coherent and effective performance of the movement.

    Our interpretation of the piece views the opening theme (the refrain of a rondo form) as an expression of exuberant individuality that struggles against the conventionality of the episode sections.  This thematic conflict creates a narrative structure that continues until the movement’s conclusion, where the defiant theme appears at one point to have been pacified, but ultimately wins out over the elements of conformity.

    Top

    Program