picture from Suzuki Memorial page |
Talent Education
|
| by Petra Schwarthoff |
    AbstractTalent Education, often called the Suzuki Method, is an interesting, but heavily debated pedagogical approach. Teachers are heavily divided in their opinions about the Suzuki method: a teacher either belongs to the Suzuki circle, or he/she is outside it and called a "traditional" teacher. This paper gives an introduction into the Suzuki method, its history and main principles in areas of parent involvement, listening, rote learning, note reading, movement, group and private lessons, and child development. These principles are compared with current research data, and enhanced with viewpoints from Suzuki and traditional teachers. The idea of this study is to combine the principles of Suzuki's Talent Education with the current research, and to find important applications for violin teachers in general. The paper concludes with a universal call to all teachers to take advantage of every opportunity to improve teaching and to keep an eye on the current research.
Contents
History of Talent Education Method of Instruction     Introduction    Fifty years since its conception, Talent Education, often called the Suzuki Method, has spread all over the world. It is currently growing in over 30 countries. A World Wide Web search (Yahoo!) on "Suzuki and Violin" resulted in with over 1200 hits. There are 336 articles in the Online Computer Library Center (OCLC).    While browsing through pedagogical string literature, readers will become aware of the Suzuki Method, which is mentioned everywhere. In Strategies for teaching strings and orchestra published by the Music Educators National Conference (MENC), Suzuki book I is used as repertoire book. Other Suzuki books like Nurtured by love, Shinichi Suzuki: The man and his philosophy, and Suzuki cello school are listed for additional resource information. The author of The strings - a comparative view (Skoldberg, 1982) writes: "The Suzuki approach which has been so highly successful with young children, stresses an early development of aural sensitivity through rote teaching and the playing of recordings." String guides like Teaching strings by Klotman and Guide to teaching strings by Lamp have extra chapters on the Suzuki Method. In contrast to Carl Seashore , who believed that musical talent was an inborn trait that was only given to a few individuals, Suzuki strongly believed that every child has an enormous learning potential and that an early and appropriate environment could enhance it. Howard Gardener developed a theory of multiple intelligences and noticed that talents (or intelligences) can't develop without at least some opportunities for exploration. To cultivate the musical intelligence he often refers to Talent Education. He mentions Suzuki Education quite often, three times in Multiple Intelligences and seven times in Frames of Mind, including two subchapters: "The Suzuki Talent Education Method" and "a critique of the Suzuki approach:" I am impressed with the method of training developed by the Japanese master Shinichi Suzuki for teaching music to young children. The method works because Suzuki has identified the factors that matter in developing musical skill in early life - such as finger arrangements possible on the violin, the kinds of pattern that can be readily recognized and sung by young children, the capacity to imitate mothers, the tendency to identify with slightly older peers, and so on (Gardener, 1983, p.48).    The first exercise should be practiced by ear, the teacher to play, and the pupil to imitate. At first the open strings will suffice. The pupil must first practice short bows (in the middle of the frog) and then longer bows: at first in slow tempo, and then more rapidly. These exercises should at once assume a rhythmic form, and very soon the pupil may play upon the open strings and with the proper division of the bow. For exercises to be played from memory, the teacher may choose songs and hymns already familiar to the pupil from his school-days. Hymns are particularly well adapted for the cultivation of a full and vigorous tone (p.28).     It is time that traditional teachers and Suzuki teachers meet in the middle and draw from each other. Both should treat each other with respect, because both have the same goal: happy and fulfilled human beings, who grown up with an appreciation for music. It is time to end the destructive debate "Suzuki violin versus traditional violin" (Coff, 1998).This little story reveals how much work needs to be done:     On director reported that a mother requested permission to sit in at an orchestra session to observe and evaluate the operation of the class. This mother displayed the concern common to many parents of Suzuki-trained players, often reinforced by Suzuki teachers, about whether 'those public school students' are good enough to make music with their children (Brathwaite, 1988, p.42).     History of Talent Education    Shinichi Suzuki was born in Nagoya, Japan, in 1898. His father was founder of the largest violin factory in the world in that time. At the age of seventeen he heard his first gramophone recording with Mischa Elman, a famous violinist. His interest for the violin was awakening.     It made a tremendous impression on me. To think, the violin, which I considered a toy, could produce such a beauty of tone! Elman's "Ave Maria" opened my eyes to music. I had no idea why my soul was so moved. But at least I had already developed the ability to appreciate this beauty. My profound emotion was the first step in my search for the true meaning of art (Suzuki, 1983, p. 69).     This marked the beginning of Suzuki's violin study, which soon brought him to Tokyo to study with Ko Ando Koda. In 1920 he went to Berlin, Germany. On his three-month search for a good and soul-touching teacher he heard Karl Klingler and arranged to study with him. While in Berlin he met a German singer who became his wife. At the age of thirty-one he returned to Japan and formed a string quartet with his brothers. Their main goal was the introduction of western chamber music to Japanese audiences. During that time Suzuki started to teach violin in various universities using a European traditional method. However, he became more and more interested in the education of young children.     In 1945 he started to develop his Talent Education School. Two major incidents had an effect on Suzuki's philosophy. The first occurred during an audition, where Suzuki noticed great resemblance between a father and his son. The only teacher the son had so far was his father. Suzuki was so impressed by this fact that he decided to teach children, stressing cooperation with their parents. The second incident occurred while Suzuki was in Germany. He noticed that all German children spoke fluent German. In fact, all children throughout the world speak their native tongues with the utmost fluency. While this observation seems trivial, Suzuki made the transfer from speaking the native language to playing a musical instrument: He assumed that any child is able to gain musical abilities if only the correct methods are used for the training. This led him to the conclusion, that the perfect educational method for all learning processes, especially music, is the "mother tongue."     For thirty years now I have been pleading with people to believe that all children can be well educated, and not to turn away those who drop behind in learning. I named my method Talent Education, and began an educational movement in which children dropping behind or struggling to get along are not turned away. The day of my startling discovery became for me the starting point in my search for human potentials (Suzuki, 1983, p.3).     Suzuki's basic ideas are: talent is not inherited; good environmental conditions produce superior abilities; what does not exist in the cultural environment will not develop in the child; and we need to look at the parents to guess what the children will be like.     In 1958 a Japanese student at Oberlin College presented a film of Suzuki's young students performing in a national concert. American string teachers became interested in the Suzuki method and began to visit Japan to learn more about his work. Interest intensified in 1964 when Suzuki brought a group of students to tour the U.S. and perform at a joint meeting of the American String Teachers Association and the Music Educators National Conference. The method began to grow in the U.S. with visits of American teachers to Japan, performances of Japanese tour groups, and the growth of hundreds of Suzuki programs across the country.     Today the Suzuki Association of America (SAA) has 7,500 active teachers and 200,000 students, parents and other professional members. International or Regional Associations exist in Japan, Australia, Europe, Africa, the Middle East, East Asia and elsewhere. SAA has a membership directory, teacher registry, job listings, a library, and insurance programs for instruments and health, and is publisher of the American Suzuki Journal, free for all members. Many Suzuki Schools also publish newsletters for parents and teachers to support their ideas and announce concerts, upcoming events, and changes in the local school settings. Summer institutes offer student and teacher training. This activity is getting more and more popular. Many retailers like Shar Products, Southwest Strings or The String House offer special features and extra sections for Suzuki products.     Method of Instruction    Suzuki's dream is that every child should have the opportunity to learn music in a nurtured and positive environment that respects the individual. He envisions the development of the whole child, growing into a fine human being with feelings of self worth. A slogan from Suzuki is: "Education through music!"     Suzuki believes that if children are surrounded by music in the same way that they are surrounded by speech, they acquire the ability for music as easily as they acquire the ability to communicate. With this idea in mind, he developed the "mother tongue approach," or talent education. His philosophy is nicely explained in his book Nurtured by love (translated into English by his wife). Unfortunately the text gives only little insight into the method used by Suzuki and thousands of Suzuki Schools to teach violin or other instruments. Many people wrote guides for the developing Suzuki Schools: Kendall, 1973; Starr, 1976; Slone, 1982; Landers, 1984; Romeo, 1986; and Lee, 1992 to mention only a few.     Blaker (1995, p.3365) "investigated the scope and implementation of Suzuki violin instruction in [41] community music school programs." She investigated the size of the faculty and student enrollment, the characteristics of the teachers, and the characteristics of the programs. Most programs were successful in implementing the basic principles of the Suzuki method. Following is a summary of these principles used in Suzuki Schools all over the world. The information in the following 15 principles was mainly found on the internet.
|
Part 2    
Bibliography