intercom home  |  advanced search  |  about intercom  |  alerts  |  faq  |  help  |  rss  

user functions

Current Ithaca College community members may contribute stories and comments as well as view additional topics by logging in. ➤



Sign up to receive a summary of Intercom headlines via e-mail three times a week.

NARB Recommends Discontinuing Claims for Petmate Cat Litter Pans; Panel Chaired by Scott Hamula (IMC)

Contributed by Danae Lowman on 07/09/19 

View printable version

 A panel of the National Advertising Review Board (NARB) has found that Doskocil Manufacturing Company, Inc., doing business as Petmate, did not provide proper support for an implied odor-reduction benefit communicated by its antimicrobial protection claims for Petmate Cat Litter Pans, and recommended that such claims be discontinued. The advertising at issue had been challenged by Van Ness Plastic Molding Company, a manufacturer of competing cat litter pans, before the National Advertising Division (NAD). Following the NAD’s decision, Petmate sought review by the NARB, the appellate unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation.

The antimicrobial protection-claims at issue appeared on product packaging for Petmate cat litter pans sold under the well-known consumer brand Arm & Hammer. On the principal package panel, above a product description, the following appears prominently: “With Built-In Antimicrobial Product Protection.” Below the product description, in smaller but still easy-to-read letters, the package states: “Inhibits the Growth of Odor-Causing Bacteria on the Pan” in solid capital letters. These claims are based on the incorporation into the plastic of an established antimicrobial agent, Microban “Additive B,” supplied by Microban Company.

In its decision, NAD determined that the challenged Petmate advertising conveys a health benefit claim of antimicrobial protection against the possible spread of disease. The NARB panel did not agree, concluding that when fairly read in context, the challenged package claims do not convey a health-related message.

However, the NARB panel agreed with NAD’s finding that the challenged advertising communicates a strong, implied, odor-protection or odor-improvement message. With regard to Petmate’s scientific evidence offered in support of this message, which consisted of supplier testing showing antimicrobial activity on the surface of the plastic pans, the NARB panel agreed with NAD’s conclusion that such test method does not show whether users of the cat litter pans will detect a difference in the odor emanating from the pan. Thus, Petmate’s testing does not substantiate the consumer relevance of the implied odor reduction claims, and the NARB panel recommended that they be discontinued.

NARB is the appellate unit of the advertising industry’s system of self-regulation and administered by the Council of Better Business Bureaus. NARB Panel #239 members were associate professor and panel chair, Scott R. Hamula; CEO & Brand Advocate of MDB Communications, Cary Hatch; VP, CRM & Analytics of Major League Soccer, Charlie Shin; Director of New Product Development at LG Electronics, Tim Alessi; and Founder & CEO of BlackBird Communications Group, Jim Tenny.

NARB Recommends Discontinuing Claims for Petmate Cat Litter Pans; Panel Chaired by Scott Hamula (IMC) | 0 Comments |
The following comments are the opinions of the individuals who posted them. They do not necessarily represent the position of Intercom or Ithaca College, and the editors reserve the right to monitor and delete comments that violate College policies.
Refresh view